Showing posts with label feedback. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feedback. Show all posts

Sunday, 17 August 2014

HSC Chemistry Questions, Feedback, Links

HSC STUDY GUIDES, FEEDBACK LINKS & REVISION VIDEOS

HSC Chem Study Guides here 

HSC Physics Study Guides here


9.1 - SKILLS    Video 1/1







































Remember this - All it takes is "Just Work"!




And watch this before your study/exams etc - How could you not want to do well and dominate the state after watching this ?



Tuesday, 17 September 2013

9.6.7 HSC Feedback

2001 e)
EVALUATE means + / - and judgement (with criteria) – ie want to restore the artefact to as close to original condition as possible without further degradation. So for each step say the pros and cons. And when there is a decision to be made (ie a criteria/evaluation) say why eg mechanical vs acid concretion removal & stripping vs electrolysis of corrosion.
Remember to store in water first (why), leach (why – and NB leaching only removes SOLUBLE salts) remove concretions (here is a change to discuss pros and cons of mechanical vs chemical removal), electrolysis (pros and cons – cons mainly in terms of current and rate of electrolysis vs surface damage)
WHENEVER discussing electrolysis ALWAYS say a) It removes INSOLUBLE SALTS unlike leaching, b) It draws anions out of the artefact (eg Cl-) c) It restores the metal surface (ie metal ions reduced back to the surface)  AND d) WITHOUT FURTHER DAMAGE. ALWAYS use equations for the anode and cathode AND for the cathode reactions make sure you show the correct corrosion product being reduced (Fe(OH)Cl, Cu(OH)Cl, Ag2S or PbS). NB in basic solutions the anode reaction will be 2OH- => 1/2O2 + H2O + 2e-

2002 cii)
Chemical procedures = leaching, concretion removal with acid, corrosion product stripping with citric acid/thiourea (Cu or EDTA (Pb), electrolysis and H-furnace (Fe) – make sure you show equations for the ones you chose.
If you have t speak about a specific artefact with chemical treatment choose the cannon over the anchor.

2003 e)
ASSESS = INTRO, +ve, -ve, judgement
INTRO = define electrolysis (perhaps brief history Davy/Faraday)
+ve = a) It removes INSOLUBLE SALTS unlike leaching, b) It draws anions out of the artefact (eg Cl-) c) It restores the metal surface (ie metal ions reduced back to the surface)  AND d) WITHOUT FURTHER DAMAGE.
-ve = trickier but   it requires energy, time, cannot remove concretions, cannot remove some oxides (eg why H-furnace is used for Fe artefacts sometimes)
Judgement = Has it developed artefact restoration? – ie before this could surface be restored? Could insoluble salts be removed?..

2004 aii)
Wood can be degraded and oxidised but not corroded (metals corrode)

2005 di)
The wax is a BARRIER to oxygen and electrolyte (water/humidity) preventing corrosion
2006 c)
The coins were encrusted (see diagram) thus you can’t just say that Cu artefacts wont have concretions
STEPS
1) Keep wet to avoid crystallisation of salt(and show what happens with equations)
2) Leach – Na2CO3 to prevent dissolution of Pb or Zn & Sn from Cu alloys
3) Concretion removal – with ACID for coins and don’t want to dameg surface engravings – perhaps only dilute/weak acid too else bubbling might damage surface
4) Leaching again?
5) For the Pb you might want to strip with EDTA as the surface is not important BUT for Cu the surface IS important (coins) thus you probably wont strip off the corrosion products as you want to RESTORE the Cu in the corrosion back to the surface
6) Electrolysis of coins – (and Pb?) make sure you use the correct equations – see notes for Q 2001e) above
VERY important – electrolysis removes corrosion NOT concretions
2010 a)
Don’t forget that the metal bands are part of the artefact and would be corroded!
2011 bi)
You need to know that the main corrosion product on silver is Ag2S and thus must show it being reduced back to silver (not just silver ion reduction)
2012 a)

Because the artefact material was not specified you should give SPECIFIC problems that can occur if salt crystallises in wood/leather, ceramics and metals. DON’T FORGET that acid can form on metals if salt crystallises and make sure you can write the equation for this.

Tuesday, 10 September 2013

9.6.3 HSC Question Feedback


2002 aii) – To reverse a galvanic cell and make it an electrolysis cell we have to reverse both the anode and cathode reactions. If we apply the exact opposite voltage produced by the galvanic cell all we do is stop the galvanic cell reaction. To reverse the cell we have to apply GREATER than the galvanic cell potential.

2003 bii) Any time you describe an experiment to measure the rate of electrolysis you MUST specify HOW you measured the rate – eg In our experiment we measured the mass change of the anode as an indication of the rate of reaction.

2006 bi) For the risk assessment and HOW it INFLUENCED our PROCEDURE– we used slightly toxic CuSO4 – this may have limited our concentration to lower (safer) concentrations. We also used a power pack that limited the voltage to 12V to minimise the risk of electrocution but this limited our experiment to less than 12 V

2006 bii) When providing a conclusion from YOUR OBSERVATIONS you have to state the observations – eg the electrolysis cell that had the higher voltage had a greater mass loss at the anode in a fixed time. Thus it was concluded that higher voltages increase rates of electrolysis.

2007 ai) Graphite rods are used because they are INERT (meaning that they wont react in the redox reactions) CONDUCTORS (this allows them to transport re electrons required for electrolysis) – a lot of people forgot to mention that they are conductors. GRAPHITE IS NOT A METAL!

2008 ciii) It did say “Identify” the factors that affect rates of electrolysis but which of these two answers (that take basically the same time) is going to score more highly?:

·        Voltage, electrode spacing, electrode size and electrolyte concentration all affect electrolysis rates

OR

·        ­ voltage, ¯ electrode spacing, ­ electrode size and ­ electrolyte concentration all increase electrolysis rates.

2009 d) Usually w =e would use an Ag cathode so the Ag+ conc would stay constant in solution. This reaction gives a cell potential of 0V. However, i) if you think about you will see that a spontaneous metal displacement reaction would happen between the Ni and AgNO3. thus we do need to provide a -ve potential to the Ni to prevent it dissolving. ii) A potential of 0V actually means it is in equilibrium, the Ag will ppt and dissolve at both electrodes not plate the Ni. To actually get a silver plate we need to ensure that the reduction (deposition) of Ag only happens at the spoon (cathode) and oxidation (dissolution) of silver only happens at the silver anode - ie a voltage with the -ve terminal at the spoon is needed.

2010 bii) The cathode could be identified by the hydrogen gas or hydroxide ions  BUT HOW could you test for them – ie test with pop test or use a phenolphthalein indicator…

2012 di) Validity means measuring what you intended ie the effect of ONE variable (IV) on the dependent variable. As soon as you change multiple variables you can no longer validly say which changed variable affected the DV. Many people neglected to mention that in a valid test only one variable is changed.

2020 dii) Not the greatest Q for us. All through the Q student were drawing on the reactions at the electrodes until they get to the Q where it specifically states to draw the expected results on your diagrams and everyone stops drawing them on. You should have include 3 diagrams (control and two different variables changed – one in each of the other two pictures). You should have specified the constants and drawn on th results – ie bubbles and Cu deposition showing MORE (or less) depending on what variable you were testing.

Lastly – in their diagram they had a graphite and copper electrode. You should have used the sae chemicals in your example ie the Cu as the cathode th graphite as the anode.

Monday, 2 September 2013

9.4.5 HSC Question Feedback


2001

Q14)
Remember – microscopic membrane filters pores can get clogged – any arrangement that will lead to clogging of the pores is not going to be used.

 

2002

Q26b)

Read the Q! – if it asks you to give answers in mg or mg/L – so you just have to do it! BUT DON’T FORGET SIG FIGS!

Q27)

When  asked to describe the ‘physical and chemical’ processes to treat water – most described all the processes well BUT the fact that the Q said ‘Describe the physical and chemical processes…’ rather than just ‘describe the processes…’ should have been a clue that you needed to identify which were physical and which were chemical. In addition ‘purify’ and ‘sanitise’ were in the Q – this needed o be addressed in general – ie WHY this is needed for drinking water (colour / flavour/ health). Which the definition of these terms is debateable some sources report: purification= removing unwanted particles (eg flocculation, sedimentation, filtering) while sanitation refers to removing pathogens – eg adding chlorine.

 

2003

Q26)  

First you have to link the concept of ‘nutrients’ to nitrate and phosphate (at least N and P) pollution (eg from agriculture or sewage treatment). Then outline the process of eutrophication. When it came to assessing the tests to monitor eutrophication most identified turbidity, BOD, DO and nitrate/phosphate tests as indicators of turbidity and outlined them BUT few assessed them (ie DO, BOD, turbidity indicate if eutrophication IS occurring, while nitrate and phosphate readings indicate whether eutrophication MAY occur) and very few actually said WHAT the readings would be IF there was eutrophication (ie high BOD, turbidity, N and P but low DO). Both the assess and the identification of the typical readings in eutrophication are critical for this sort of question.

REMEMBER  - Always refer to DO as an OXYGEN CONCENTRATION

 

2004

Q21a)

The intro to this question related to ‘water testing’ thus your qualitative and quantitative answer should relate to water testing – ie testing for the ‘presence’ of chemicals vs testing for the actual concentration of chemicals

 

Q21c)

Ba(NO3)2 (aq) (or BaCl2 (aq)) is used to test for phosphate and sulfate (both make a white ppt) BUT you need to specify that the barium phosphate ppt is soluble in acidic conditions but the barium sulfate ppt is not.

& Again – the NH3 we add in the flow charts Is NOT to form a precipitate it is used to neutralise the acid we added inn the previous steps. If phosphate is present it won’t for a precipitate with barium in acidic conditions but will form a precipitate once the acid has been neutralised – hence the addition of the ammonia.

 

2005

Q21b)

AAS is not a CHEMICAL test – take care to read the questions carefully.

Q21c)

We did a whole case study on lead…

A Q for you – which of these two answers - both which take equal time to write would be more likely to score highly?:

1)      Lead ion concentration in water needs to be monitored because it is toxic and if not monitored could cause harm.

2)      Lead ion concentration in water needs to be monitored because it is a neutrotoxin and if not monitored could cause harm.

Q25)

TDS means Total DISSOLVED solids – ie you only want to measure the soluble ions – hence filtering out all the non-soluble solids before evaporating the filtrate to crystallise the dissolved solids. Ie you only use the mass of the solid in the evaporating basin

Q26)

When asked for sources of contamination in a catchment, their effects and treatments:

First - make the features distinct. Don’t talk about all the features, then all their pollutants then all their treatments – this reads like a brain dump and is not clear to the markers that you UNDERSTAND the connections between source-pollutant-treatment. Instead talk about source1- pollutants from that source-treatments for that pollutant. Then talk about source 2 – its pollutants…

Second – an easy strategy is to choose ONE aspect that can cause turbidity (and turbidity is suspended particles NOT ions) eg mining, construction, agricultural soil run off, land clearing/logging = soil erosion, urban areas = excess stormwater run off. And then say how these particles can be removed by coagulation, sedimentation and filtering. THEN choose ONE aspect that can cause bacteria (pathogens) – eg sewage treatment, agriculture (manure, dead animals) and describe how chlorine must be used to treat this.

Finally – don’t jump straight to membrane filters as a ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution to water treatment. It is only used in specialist applications at the moment.

 

2006

Q27c)

 Remember that EDTA reacts with both Mg2+ and Ca2+ (and, as said above, both are assumed to be Ca for hardness analysis) BUT AAS will only test for one metal at a time so the AAS reading for Ca will be less than the EDTA test for Ca

 

2008

Q12)

Remember an estuary has salt water thus TDS will be VERY high. Towns have sewage systems so E coli will be high and DO low

Q17)

This is a question where you have to read and answer VERY carefully. But if you do red it is VERY simple. Identify one feature (eg farmland) link it to one pollutant/problem (soil erosion from cleared land = increased sediment and turbidity in the water) and to a treatment (by flocculating, sedimenting and filtering). Then repeat again for a second feature (eg town, sewage, E.coli, disease, chlorine)

 

2009

Q25a)

Always show data on the graph (draw the lines) –use  ruler and use the scale to determine the EXACT numbers

Q25b)

You must refer to the maximum value – ie each under or over. Then give a reason why one might be well under, one just under and one well-over

Q25)

No matter how good your answer is – if you don’t use the proper chemistry terminology – ie you don’t say ‘eutrophication’ – you wont get full marks. Also – re a ‘water quality issue’ NB that eutrophication and algae affect the taste, odur and can cause disease.

 

2010

Q10)

You need to know your ion testing. Ba’s flame colour is APPLE GREEN and it forms insoluble Ba-sulfate. Cu’s flame colour is EMERALD GREEN and copper sulfate is SOLUBLE!.

Q25)

Make sure you define both correctly (DO is a concentration of dissolved oxygen) BOD is the amount of oxygen used by microorganisms to decompose the organic matter in water over a 5 day period. Make sure you say why BOTH need to be monitored – DO needed for life (DO needed to measure BOD), BOD sign of organic pollutants/eutrophication…

Q31ai)

See 2005 Q25

Q31aii) Silver chloride is a WHITE ppt that darkens in sunlight (ie our ‘photography’ experiment from last year

Q31b)

Hardness- ie Ca2+ ins often occurs in bore water or water from a limestone aquifer or waterway. Limestone is CaCO3 so = lots of Ca in the water

 

2011

Q28)

For your two tests you need to

·        Outline them

·        ID if physical or chemical

·        ID the principle. Here are some easy ones suspended solids scatter light (turbidity test – physical) dissolved solids conduct electricity (TDS probe – physical), dissolved solids crystallise when the solution is evaporated (TDs – physical), Ca and Mg react with EDTA in a 1:1 ratio (Hardness – chemical)

Q31)

Impressed with the fact that mot used data from the table and made plausible reasons WHY the TDS etc increased on Tue and bacteria on Thu (one possibility is high rainfall = erosion on Tue and an consequent sewage overflow on Thu).

Saturday, 27 July 2013

9.6.5/6 HSC Q - Feedback

2002
di) Remember – we cleaned, dried & weighed all the identical samples. Then submerged them in pH buffers acidic (pH <7), neutral (pH =7) and basic (pH > 7). We observe the rate of corrosion via bubbling and colour of solution and by cleaning, drying and weighing at the end (basic = no corrosion (passivating), neutral = normal rust, acidic = no rust but iron dissolved = large mass loss.
dii) Remember that there are two reasons why metals corrode more in acidic environments i) MASH – hydrogen ions oxidize reactive metals (any metal with a –ve reduction potential). ii) Oxygen is a stronger oxidant in acidic conditions (give two oxygen reduction potential equations from the data sheet to prove) thus the rate of corrosion is higher.

2004
dii) Remember the experiment was as described in 2002di) above but we changed the oxygen concentration via having i) partially submerged, fully submerged, fully submerged with oil layer on top, fully submerged in pre-boiled water with oil layer on top. We observed qualitatively for the time until first sign of corrosion and fr the extent corrosion at the end of the experiment.
diii) To explain differences in rusting you must include the rusting equations. Even though the sunk ship is submerged the ship on the shore would be constantly wet and salty (perhaps even higher salt conc due to evaporation) so they both have an electrolyte. The temperature and oxygen concentration of the shore ship would be higher. Thus the shore ship rusted faster (as shown in the pic) NOTE – 30m is NOT deep enough for SRB and acidic microenvironments to have an impact. But you should explain why its temp and oxygen is lower (ie water high heat capacity keeps the ocean cooler and oxygen has low solubility in water as it is non-polar).

2006
bi) Yes CO2 is more soluble that oxygen in the water but it is OXYGEN that is the oxidant in rusting.
bii) Be careful how you express yourself. Low temperatures and high pressures make gases MORE SOLUBLE. But (just like the deep ocean) low tem and high pressure does not mean that there will be ‘more dissolved’ gas.

2007
ci) See 2002 di above

2010
di) As described in 2004 dii) above except we also changed oxygen concentration, salt concentration (and pH) in three different experiments. Temp was changed via use of incubator, room temp, fridge and freezer (but problems…). Oxygen conc and pH as described in 2004 dii) & 2001di). If weighing – make sure you clean dry and weight then after the experiment, wipe off the corrosion product, clean, dry and weigh AND say the larger the mass loss the greater the rate of corrosion.
dii) keep it simple – to keep the electrolyte or oxygen away from the steel – paint! (or use some other barrier protection) – 1 mark  = keep it simple

2012
ci) The conditions would be anaerobic conditions where there are sulphate ions where SRB live = eg deep ocean

9.6.4 HSC Q - Feedback


KEY POINTS
* If you are talking about barrier protection you must say it protects the iron from corrosion as it is a barrier preventing oxidant/electrolyte (oxygen/water) coating the steel, thus preventing corrosion.

* If you are talking about cathodic protection – you MUST say that there is a galvanic (or electrolytic - for impressed current) cell established between the iron and the anode (eg Zn for sacrificial anodes) where the iron is the cathode thus protected from oxidation/corrosion.

*If you’re talking about galvanising you must say BOTH of the above for the unscratched/scratched conditions

*If you are talking about Noble coatings you must say that if scratched the galvanic cell produced accelerates corrosion.

*If you are asked to discuss the use of materials over time – it is a Q about the history of shipping materials

*If you are asked to explain why steel is used in ships you have to talk about its useful properties (low $ and high strength:weight ratio) AND about the fact that its corrosion can be prevented with a range of strategies:…

2001

bii) You must note that the sacrificial anode forms a galvanic cell when in contact with the hull(and electrolyte). Ie you can’t just say that the hull is the ‘cathode’, it is ‘the cathode of the galvanic cell established when in contact with the sacrificial anode and electrolyte’. Also – while it is ‘obvious’, don’t overlook the fact that you actually need to say ‘they prevent corrosion/oxidation of the hull’ –but they DON’T protect because the cause the hull to be reduced (ie the iron doesn’t turn into negative iron ions) – the hull becomes the site of reduction – so oxidation cannot occur there (nd any iron irons that have formed will be reduced back into iron).

diii) Define terms – accuracy is how close measurements are to the actual value (ie the measuring equipment and measuring technique used to take each reading). Validity is whether an experiment measured what was intended (ie did it actually address the aim/hypothesis) – this is determined by control of variables (all but IV and DV are constant) and ensuring accuracy and reliability. Reliability is whether the result are repeatable – this is done by repeating the experiment and checking for consistency. So to improve accuracy you need more sensitive measuring apparatus or a more accurate technique. For reliability you must repeat the experiment – but this is where you can talk about control of variables too as if there is no control of variables there will be variation in results.. See here.

2005

c) For BIG mark Q in the electives (6-8 marks) you will always need to include equations. For this Q the equations should have related to corrosion protection and rusting. Eg sacrificial anode equations, impressed current equations etc. For barriers you must say they prevent contact between metal and oxygen/water (ie oxidant/electrolyte) thus preventing corrosion. For scratched noble, scratched galvanised, sacrificial anodes explanations you MSUT say that a galvanic cell is established between them and the base metal. This was a DISCUSS question so you MUST mention disadvantages of all corrosion protection techniques as well as advantages. Eg stainless = expensive, paints (*even rustmaster) do not work if scratched and need maintenance, sacrificial anodes need replacing, impressed current needs electrolyte and constant power supply. Surface alloying more expensive than paint and cant protect deep scratches (and stainless surface can be attacked by Cl ions just like normal stainless steel). Replacement metals often too expensive for whole hull and/r inferior mechanical properties.

2006

diii) For cathodic protection you must specify that there is a voltage applied so that electrons are supplied to the structure (ie iron) to make it a cathode (of an electrolytic cell) thus preventing oxidation/corrosion. Also – the tower is NOT in an electrolyte thus sacrificial anodes and impressed current will not be the best choice. It would be ideal to describe a method suitable for the tower and one for the pylons.

2007

b) A lot of people misinterpreted this Q to just be about ‘factors that increase corrosion’ In this Q it as important to note that corrosion involves a redox reaction with the metal being oxidised and thus the warm, oxygen rich, salty water where ships travel is ideal for corrosion BUT because this question specified the choice of meals over time so this was a clue (“over time”) that it was about the history of shipping metals =  you need to mention the use if Cu in early ships, Fe Nails, Fe hulls, steel hulls, modern steel hulls with low impurities and  Mn, Si added etc. Then modern alloying  eg stainless and alloys that are used as fittings etc on ships (brass, bronze, Cu-Ni, Al) and sacrificial anode materials. ie for each development say their +/- focussing on marine factors – eg Cu biocidal against marine organisms but heavy/soft. Fe strong and easily shaped but rusted. Modern alloys corrosion resistant but $$ of softer then steel = used for specialised applications. One thing I strongly recommend focussing on – we know Fe has a problem with rust so we choose REACTIVE metals such as Mg / Zn to act as sacrificial anodes – this is ideal to discuss as these are i) metals (so answering the Q), ii) they overcome a limitation of steel in the marine environment, ii) you can use equation and talk about how the ocean provides the electrolyte etc.

2008

ai) As above for 2006 diii, you have to say that there is a galvanic cell setup between the Fe and sacrificial anode. And because it specified equations use the Zn oxidation equation and NB that any iron ions are reduced back to Fe on the surface (then put the Fe reduction equation), Note this set-up could not be impressed current as there is no external power supply.


2009

aii) You can talk about the aluminium passivating layer ‘coating’ but should focus on plastic and Sn coatings of steel, NB tin is unreactive and non-toxic, and will not corrode in acidic solutions (ie betroot) – but sets up a galvanic cell between itself and iron if scratched where Fe is the anode and thus rusts rapidly. Plastic is a barrier to oxygen and electrolyte contacting the steel when intact but when scratched…

b) When adding a Zn coating, the Zn corrodes slowly because it is passivating, but be careful saying ‘the steel is given a passivating layer’ because unlike stainless steel, the passivating layer forms on the Zn coating NOT on the steel itself. You need to say that galvanising provides a barrier to oxidant/electrolyte thus corrosion wont occur when intact AND must say that a galvanic cell is produced when the layer is scratched with Fe as the cathode of the galvanic cell thus cannot corrode

2011

di) The samples should have been washed and lightly sanded to remove any corrosion product that could affect the results. They could have been weighed. They should have been placed in separate samples in case the ions produced by their oxidation influenced the corrosion of the other samples. Ideally they would have the same size / shape and be stress free. Note: There will be no ‘sacrificial anode effects’ because the samples are not in electrical contact so there will be no galvanic acceleration/slowing of corrosion – HOWEVER  if Cu ions (for example) were produced they could cause metal displacement reactions with Fe, Zn etc

di) This is an ASSESS = INTRO (Define validity), PROS (same electrolyte, temperature & time for each) COMS = he samples were all different size, shape (and stress levels different) – uncontrolled variables means the validity is low (cannot be sure of alloy material or stress/size/shape influenced the result). Qualitative photographic method is not as accurate as quantitative methods. Thus validity low.

2012

e) Brain dump – must introduce corrosion, the history of boating from wood – wood/metal, iron, steel, modern steel (and composition). Then need to say advantages of steel to outweigh poor corrosion resistance because of protection systems that can be applied – replacements (for specific jobs) barriers, galvanised, cathodic protection. But because it is an EVALUATE – you needed to end with a judgement on ‘the continued use of steel’ ie Steel use is justified because of its superior strength, low cost and because its corrosion can be prevented with a range of protection systems’

Friday, 26 July 2013

9.6.2 HSC Q - Feedbak


2001

c) You needed to answer this Q. You should have described the effect of increasing C% but also said why Mn, Si & Cu are added to steel in small amounts. You should have detailed what the Cr, Ni and Mo are for in stainless steel and what the Ti (and Nb…etc) are used for in HSLA steel. Tis would be a very good Q to practise.

2003

aii) You must note the properties of the passivating layer on passivating metals. For active metals you must say that they react with air/water to corrode but their corrosion product is often porous and non-tightly bound (eg rust)  = NO BARRIER to further corrosion.

2005

bii) You would get metal displacement between Mg and Fe ions – detail reactions & explain why in terms of defining metal displacement and relating to Fe and Mg reactivity. Also – you would get rusting of the nail – there is no electrical contact between the Mg and Fe so no galvanic (sacrificial anode) cell can form – thus detail the rusting equations. This is a question to redo!

2008

b) If you start describing an experiment we didn’t do you risk accidentally missing something that a student who DID the experiment you described would not = putting you at a disadvantage. We put iron and stainless steel in test tubes of equal conc salt water, same temp, pressure …. We weighed before and after 20 days. Visually observed (first appearance of rust and final extent of rust – qualitative comparison) and weighed mass of samples once corrosion had been wiped off. Stainless = no corrosion or mass loss. Iron – lots of orange/brown corrosion and small mass loss. Was it reliable – NO – but you can still demonstrate your understanding of reliability by noting that and defining reliability OR you can say these values were compared to the results of the previous year of HSC Chemistry classes and were found to be consist.

2010

c) There was  bit of a fuss that year because despite the fact that the Q says they are steels, #3 is clearly cast iron. You should pick up on this (ie anything > 2.1wt%C is no longer steel) and specify its uses in gates/cookware/hotplates etc – hard strong good heat retention. You need to explain what happens to the properties of steel when C is increases (ie compare properties and applications of #1 and #2 – NB you should explain why corrosion rates increase in terms of cathode sites). For Steel #4 you need to explain what both the Cr and the Ni do.

9.6.1 HSC Q - Feedback


2004

b) You need to analyse the IMPACT – thus say that he studies electrolysis, made the laws and invented the terminology but also say how this impacted the knowledge/use of electrolysis – ie make a statement that it allowed electrolysis to be applied to industry, or that it allowed for greater ‘collaboration’ and communication between scientists which increased out understanding further…

2009

c) The flow chart arrows in the question are a clue that the scientists research is linked so you need to make the connections between them clear.

Galvani – animal electricity – Volta - disproved animal electricity with Voltaic pile – Davy – used voltaic pile for electrolysis – Faraday – devised the laws of electrolysis.

Key points to include (italics = optional)

Galvani – iron and brass in circuit touching nerve in frogs leg = jump = concluded jump caused by animal electricity from the muscle. Circuit produced was first recorded continuous current. Realised that metals were electrical conductors

Volta – made voltaic pile (describe) produced electricity sans-frog = disproved animal electricity. Proposed contact between metals as source of electricity. Realised current produced depended on the combination of metals (start of activity series). Voltaic pile = precursor to modern batteries and first reliable source of continuous current.

Davy – Used the voltaic pile to perform electrolysis of compounds – decomposed water and acids (ie water a compound, disproved Lavoisier), decompose molten salts to extract reactive metals (eg K) for the first time thus showed potential for electrolysis to be applied to scientific research and metal extraction for industry. Realised that electricity was decomposing compounds = breaking bonds = bonding must be electrical in nature. Realised it was reactions between electrode and electrolyte that were producing current in voltaic pile.

Faraday – Davy’s student/apprentice. Developed a device to measure charge passing through an electrolytic cell. Used this to devise the two laws of electrolysis (give). Quantitative laws meant electrolysis could be applied to scientific and industrial projects. Developed the terminology we use for electrochemistry (eg cation cathode, catholyte, electrolyte) allowed scientists to communicate/collaborate and further develop understanding of electrochemistry.

 

Thursday, 25 July 2013

9.4.3 HS Questions Feedback


THE BIG ADVICE:

You need to get in the mindset and be hyperaware that that you need to distinguish yourself. No matter how much you know if you don’t include detail, address the verb, define terms etc, there is no way of distinguishing you from someone who knows nothing. Ask yourself – could someone who was trying to ‘wing it’ write my answer? What have I added that cannot be ‘winged’ that makes me stand out?

2001

Q13) Note – Barium sulphate ppt forms almost immediately – waiting will not make more precipitate

26a) Make your data points stand out. Not just tiny dots (but not huge blobs either)

Q15) The solubility rules are very simple and we have used them since yr 11. I am disappointed that anyone got this question wrong. And considering that our flowchart test for lead is to add chloride ions those who put A and D really need t ask if they are taking ownership of their learning in this subject.

2002

Q24) If asked to assess the impact of AAS always give an illustrative example/case study. Also note that it was more accurate than previous methods and say ‘eg gravimetric analysis’ thus could determine previously unknown roles of trace elements. Also always define key terms in questions. In this Q you had to define ‘trace element’. – NB because lead has NO biological function it is NOT a trace element. Being an assess you should have also had a judgement.

2003

27b) DEFINE KEY TERMS – Reliability – repeat with consistent results – was it repeated?... THEN go on to talk about other errors – excess Ba added?, acid dissolution?, washed and dried?. EVALUATE NEEDS A JUDGEMENT! If you don’t talk about reliability/repetition and just talk about error you are assessing validity/accuracy. Also – sulfates will ppt in all pH’s, it is only carbonates and phosphates that don’t ppt at low pH – hence low pH is idea if you only want to ppt sulfates.

28) Use a ruler to draw ONE straight line of best fit. And USE your graph to calculate concentrations. The whole point of AAS is accuracy. You don’t buy and multi million S AAS machine, go through the process of making an accurate calibration curve and testing your samples only to use your eye and make a rough guess about he concentration “About 5ppm”… To prove it was Sewage you have to state what the Cd was upstream and downstream of it and somehow show it cant be from the industrial plant.

2004

20) This  is a critical Q testing your understanding of AAS. The light source contains the metal being tested to produce the exact wavelength of light that will be absorbed by the sample (to increase accuracy and NB% absorbance proportional to conc). The flame atomises the sample o the atoms CAN absorb those unique wavelengths of its absorption spectrum (remember element only absorb emit their unique spectra when atomised).

20b) Again – define validity and reliability. Is testing from one sample (even if it is tested 5 time) really a reliable way of analysing a whole industrial site? Did they calculate the absorbance in a valid manner? Is AS itself a valid and reliable and accurate technique?

20c) If you write NH3 for the phosphate test give yourself a facepalm then go back and check our flowchart an flowchart equations VERY carefully. IF you used Ba io ns for both phosphate and sulphate without distinguishing them give yourself a facepalm (other hand). The whole point of ppt tests is to be unambiguous you can have a white Ba ppt signifying both sulfate ad phosphate unless you sy that the phosphate dissolves in acid but the sulphate ppt does not.

2005

Q25b) A chemical test  = a precipitation test (AAS is a physical test as it involves no chemical reactions). And while Cl- is OK a better one would be to add I- as it gives the distinctive ‘canary yellow’ ppt.

Q25c) The statement said ‘concentrations’ so your answer should have given an example concentration. And you justify the need to monitor BY showing how bad it is if it is in the body – ie it needs to be monitored to avoid these problems.

2006

Q25) You had to make estimates of concentration from the graph AND concentrations need units – ie ppm! Also – don’t say ‘approximately’ unless you know the data is very unreliable– it is AAS data – ay your results with conviction!

Q26b) To explain the order you should also say what would happen if the correct order was not used eg add Ag first and get a white ppt which could mean….?

2007

Q14) When electrons ‘fall back’ they EMIT light not absorb light and this is absorption spectroscopy. The light is NOT white light, it is the light from the spectral lamp.

17a) No matter how far you are through the course ALWAYS use the cross method to make sure your ionic formulae are correct. States DO matter. If they are solutions the reactants must be aqueous. In a one mark ‘write the equation’ question you will get ZERO if one state is wrong.

19b) Not much working was shown for this Q – very suspicious. If not showing mathematical working you need to show your explanation – ie X mg/L but the tablet was only in 100ml. Thus the mass would have been 1/10th this value = 0.X mg in the tablet.

2009

Q24) This was a big Q for 5 marks, You needed to briefly intro the fact the elements have unique spectra, you needed to BRIEFLY outline the AAS process lamp, furnace, monochromator, detector, (WITH A DIAGRAM) CRITICAL to note that the % of light absorbed is proportional to conc. outline the calibration curve  then ID the fact that it is accurate then give an example of environmental monitoring – and NB the trace element ones are OK for environmental monitoring but ‘environmental monitoring’ in the HSC context usually means pollution – ie lead. If I was doing the HSC this is one of those Q that I would practise a few times as it covers the whole range of AAs concepts in one question.

2010

29a) Broken record time – DEFINE VALIDITY FIRST. All the SULFATE in the fertiliser was dissolved (NB they filter out the solids before adding Ba so clearly not all the fertilizer dissolved – but we only care that the sulphate dissolved). All the sulphate was ppt by excess Ba ions. All the ppt remained in the filter paper. The ppt and paper was fully rinsed. The ppt and paper was dried to constant mass. That no carbonate or phosphate ppts formed with Ba. Also – regardless of *that* years marking scheme – for three marks they could expect three validity issues.

2012

Q32) This is an excellent test of your data analysis and calculations skills. A LOT of solutions matched the Success One book very closely. THIS IS FINE as long as you are learning. This is another question that I would come back to a number o times to make sure I understood how to answer this type of question. Ie come back to it and try again without looking at your previous answer.