Tuesday 17 September 2013

9.6.7 HSC Feedback

2001 e)
EVALUATE means + / - and judgement (with criteria) – ie want to restore the artefact to as close to original condition as possible without further degradation. So for each step say the pros and cons. And when there is a decision to be made (ie a criteria/evaluation) say why eg mechanical vs acid concretion removal & stripping vs electrolysis of corrosion.
Remember to store in water first (why), leach (why – and NB leaching only removes SOLUBLE salts) remove concretions (here is a change to discuss pros and cons of mechanical vs chemical removal), electrolysis (pros and cons – cons mainly in terms of current and rate of electrolysis vs surface damage)
WHENEVER discussing electrolysis ALWAYS say a) It removes INSOLUBLE SALTS unlike leaching, b) It draws anions out of the artefact (eg Cl-) c) It restores the metal surface (ie metal ions reduced back to the surface)  AND d) WITHOUT FURTHER DAMAGE. ALWAYS use equations for the anode and cathode AND for the cathode reactions make sure you show the correct corrosion product being reduced (Fe(OH)Cl, Cu(OH)Cl, Ag2S or PbS). NB in basic solutions the anode reaction will be 2OH- => 1/2O2 + H2O + 2e-

2002 cii)
Chemical procedures = leaching, concretion removal with acid, corrosion product stripping with citric acid/thiourea (Cu or EDTA (Pb), electrolysis and H-furnace (Fe) – make sure you show equations for the ones you chose.
If you have t speak about a specific artefact with chemical treatment choose the cannon over the anchor.

2003 e)
ASSESS = INTRO, +ve, -ve, judgement
INTRO = define electrolysis (perhaps brief history Davy/Faraday)
+ve = a) It removes INSOLUBLE SALTS unlike leaching, b) It draws anions out of the artefact (eg Cl-) c) It restores the metal surface (ie metal ions reduced back to the surface)  AND d) WITHOUT FURTHER DAMAGE.
-ve = trickier but   it requires energy, time, cannot remove concretions, cannot remove some oxides (eg why H-furnace is used for Fe artefacts sometimes)
Judgement = Has it developed artefact restoration? – ie before this could surface be restored? Could insoluble salts be removed?..

2004 aii)
Wood can be degraded and oxidised but not corroded (metals corrode)

2005 di)
The wax is a BARRIER to oxygen and electrolyte (water/humidity) preventing corrosion
2006 c)
The coins were encrusted (see diagram) thus you can’t just say that Cu artefacts wont have concretions
STEPS
1) Keep wet to avoid crystallisation of salt(and show what happens with equations)
2) Leach – Na2CO3 to prevent dissolution of Pb or Zn & Sn from Cu alloys
3) Concretion removal – with ACID for coins and don’t want to dameg surface engravings – perhaps only dilute/weak acid too else bubbling might damage surface
4) Leaching again?
5) For the Pb you might want to strip with EDTA as the surface is not important BUT for Cu the surface IS important (coins) thus you probably wont strip off the corrosion products as you want to RESTORE the Cu in the corrosion back to the surface
6) Electrolysis of coins – (and Pb?) make sure you use the correct equations – see notes for Q 2001e) above
VERY important – electrolysis removes corrosion NOT concretions
2010 a)
Don’t forget that the metal bands are part of the artefact and would be corroded!
2011 bi)
You need to know that the main corrosion product on silver is Ag2S and thus must show it being reduced back to silver (not just silver ion reduction)
2012 a)

Because the artefact material was not specified you should give SPECIFIC problems that can occur if salt crystallises in wood/leather, ceramics and metals. DON’T FORGET that acid can form on metals if salt crystallises and make sure you can write the equation for this.

Tuesday 10 September 2013

9.6.3 HSC Question Feedback


2002 aii) – To reverse a galvanic cell and make it an electrolysis cell we have to reverse both the anode and cathode reactions. If we apply the exact opposite voltage produced by the galvanic cell all we do is stop the galvanic cell reaction. To reverse the cell we have to apply GREATER than the galvanic cell potential.

2003 bii) Any time you describe an experiment to measure the rate of electrolysis you MUST specify HOW you measured the rate – eg In our experiment we measured the mass change of the anode as an indication of the rate of reaction.

2006 bi) For the risk assessment and HOW it INFLUENCED our PROCEDURE– we used slightly toxic CuSO4 – this may have limited our concentration to lower (safer) concentrations. We also used a power pack that limited the voltage to 12V to minimise the risk of electrocution but this limited our experiment to less than 12 V

2006 bii) When providing a conclusion from YOUR OBSERVATIONS you have to state the observations – eg the electrolysis cell that had the higher voltage had a greater mass loss at the anode in a fixed time. Thus it was concluded that higher voltages increase rates of electrolysis.

2007 ai) Graphite rods are used because they are INERT (meaning that they wont react in the redox reactions) CONDUCTORS (this allows them to transport re electrons required for electrolysis) – a lot of people forgot to mention that they are conductors. GRAPHITE IS NOT A METAL!

2008 ciii) It did say “Identify” the factors that affect rates of electrolysis but which of these two answers (that take basically the same time) is going to score more highly?:

·        Voltage, electrode spacing, electrode size and electrolyte concentration all affect electrolysis rates

OR

·        ­ voltage, ¯ electrode spacing, ­ electrode size and ­ electrolyte concentration all increase electrolysis rates.

2009 d) Usually w =e would use an Ag cathode so the Ag+ conc would stay constant in solution. This reaction gives a cell potential of 0V. However, i) if you think about you will see that a spontaneous metal displacement reaction would happen between the Ni and AgNO3. thus we do need to provide a -ve potential to the Ni to prevent it dissolving. ii) A potential of 0V actually means it is in equilibrium, the Ag will ppt and dissolve at both electrodes not plate the Ni. To actually get a silver plate we need to ensure that the reduction (deposition) of Ag only happens at the spoon (cathode) and oxidation (dissolution) of silver only happens at the silver anode - ie a voltage with the -ve terminal at the spoon is needed.

2010 bii) The cathode could be identified by the hydrogen gas or hydroxide ions  BUT HOW could you test for them – ie test with pop test or use a phenolphthalein indicator…

2012 di) Validity means measuring what you intended ie the effect of ONE variable (IV) on the dependent variable. As soon as you change multiple variables you can no longer validly say which changed variable affected the DV. Many people neglected to mention that in a valid test only one variable is changed.

2020 dii) Not the greatest Q for us. All through the Q student were drawing on the reactions at the electrodes until they get to the Q where it specifically states to draw the expected results on your diagrams and everyone stops drawing them on. You should have include 3 diagrams (control and two different variables changed – one in each of the other two pictures). You should have specified the constants and drawn on th results – ie bubbles and Cu deposition showing MORE (or less) depending on what variable you were testing.

Lastly – in their diagram they had a graphite and copper electrode. You should have used the sae chemicals in your example ie the Cu as the cathode th graphite as the anode.

Monday 2 September 2013

9.4.5 HSC Question Feedback


2001

Q14)
Remember – microscopic membrane filters pores can get clogged – any arrangement that will lead to clogging of the pores is not going to be used.

 

2002

Q26b)

Read the Q! – if it asks you to give answers in mg or mg/L – so you just have to do it! BUT DON’T FORGET SIG FIGS!

Q27)

When  asked to describe the ‘physical and chemical’ processes to treat water – most described all the processes well BUT the fact that the Q said ‘Describe the physical and chemical processes…’ rather than just ‘describe the processes…’ should have been a clue that you needed to identify which were physical and which were chemical. In addition ‘purify’ and ‘sanitise’ were in the Q – this needed o be addressed in general – ie WHY this is needed for drinking water (colour / flavour/ health). Which the definition of these terms is debateable some sources report: purification= removing unwanted particles (eg flocculation, sedimentation, filtering) while sanitation refers to removing pathogens – eg adding chlorine.

 

2003

Q26)  

First you have to link the concept of ‘nutrients’ to nitrate and phosphate (at least N and P) pollution (eg from agriculture or sewage treatment). Then outline the process of eutrophication. When it came to assessing the tests to monitor eutrophication most identified turbidity, BOD, DO and nitrate/phosphate tests as indicators of turbidity and outlined them BUT few assessed them (ie DO, BOD, turbidity indicate if eutrophication IS occurring, while nitrate and phosphate readings indicate whether eutrophication MAY occur) and very few actually said WHAT the readings would be IF there was eutrophication (ie high BOD, turbidity, N and P but low DO). Both the assess and the identification of the typical readings in eutrophication are critical for this sort of question.

REMEMBER  - Always refer to DO as an OXYGEN CONCENTRATION

 

2004

Q21a)

The intro to this question related to ‘water testing’ thus your qualitative and quantitative answer should relate to water testing – ie testing for the ‘presence’ of chemicals vs testing for the actual concentration of chemicals

 

Q21c)

Ba(NO3)2 (aq) (or BaCl2 (aq)) is used to test for phosphate and sulfate (both make a white ppt) BUT you need to specify that the barium phosphate ppt is soluble in acidic conditions but the barium sulfate ppt is not.

& Again – the NH3 we add in the flow charts Is NOT to form a precipitate it is used to neutralise the acid we added inn the previous steps. If phosphate is present it won’t for a precipitate with barium in acidic conditions but will form a precipitate once the acid has been neutralised – hence the addition of the ammonia.

 

2005

Q21b)

AAS is not a CHEMICAL test – take care to read the questions carefully.

Q21c)

We did a whole case study on lead…

A Q for you – which of these two answers - both which take equal time to write would be more likely to score highly?:

1)      Lead ion concentration in water needs to be monitored because it is toxic and if not monitored could cause harm.

2)      Lead ion concentration in water needs to be monitored because it is a neutrotoxin and if not monitored could cause harm.

Q25)

TDS means Total DISSOLVED solids – ie you only want to measure the soluble ions – hence filtering out all the non-soluble solids before evaporating the filtrate to crystallise the dissolved solids. Ie you only use the mass of the solid in the evaporating basin

Q26)

When asked for sources of contamination in a catchment, their effects and treatments:

First - make the features distinct. Don’t talk about all the features, then all their pollutants then all their treatments – this reads like a brain dump and is not clear to the markers that you UNDERSTAND the connections between source-pollutant-treatment. Instead talk about source1- pollutants from that source-treatments for that pollutant. Then talk about source 2 – its pollutants…

Second – an easy strategy is to choose ONE aspect that can cause turbidity (and turbidity is suspended particles NOT ions) eg mining, construction, agricultural soil run off, land clearing/logging = soil erosion, urban areas = excess stormwater run off. And then say how these particles can be removed by coagulation, sedimentation and filtering. THEN choose ONE aspect that can cause bacteria (pathogens) – eg sewage treatment, agriculture (manure, dead animals) and describe how chlorine must be used to treat this.

Finally – don’t jump straight to membrane filters as a ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution to water treatment. It is only used in specialist applications at the moment.

 

2006

Q27c)

 Remember that EDTA reacts with both Mg2+ and Ca2+ (and, as said above, both are assumed to be Ca for hardness analysis) BUT AAS will only test for one metal at a time so the AAS reading for Ca will be less than the EDTA test for Ca

 

2008

Q12)

Remember an estuary has salt water thus TDS will be VERY high. Towns have sewage systems so E coli will be high and DO low

Q17)

This is a question where you have to read and answer VERY carefully. But if you do red it is VERY simple. Identify one feature (eg farmland) link it to one pollutant/problem (soil erosion from cleared land = increased sediment and turbidity in the water) and to a treatment (by flocculating, sedimenting and filtering). Then repeat again for a second feature (eg town, sewage, E.coli, disease, chlorine)

 

2009

Q25a)

Always show data on the graph (draw the lines) –use  ruler and use the scale to determine the EXACT numbers

Q25b)

You must refer to the maximum value – ie each under or over. Then give a reason why one might be well under, one just under and one well-over

Q25)

No matter how good your answer is – if you don’t use the proper chemistry terminology – ie you don’t say ‘eutrophication’ – you wont get full marks. Also – re a ‘water quality issue’ NB that eutrophication and algae affect the taste, odur and can cause disease.

 

2010

Q10)

You need to know your ion testing. Ba’s flame colour is APPLE GREEN and it forms insoluble Ba-sulfate. Cu’s flame colour is EMERALD GREEN and copper sulfate is SOLUBLE!.

Q25)

Make sure you define both correctly (DO is a concentration of dissolved oxygen) BOD is the amount of oxygen used by microorganisms to decompose the organic matter in water over a 5 day period. Make sure you say why BOTH need to be monitored – DO needed for life (DO needed to measure BOD), BOD sign of organic pollutants/eutrophication…

Q31ai)

See 2005 Q25

Q31aii) Silver chloride is a WHITE ppt that darkens in sunlight (ie our ‘photography’ experiment from last year

Q31b)

Hardness- ie Ca2+ ins often occurs in bore water or water from a limestone aquifer or waterway. Limestone is CaCO3 so = lots of Ca in the water

 

2011

Q28)

For your two tests you need to

·        Outline them

·        ID if physical or chemical

·        ID the principle. Here are some easy ones suspended solids scatter light (turbidity test – physical) dissolved solids conduct electricity (TDS probe – physical), dissolved solids crystallise when the solution is evaporated (TDs – physical), Ca and Mg react with EDTA in a 1:1 ratio (Hardness – chemical)

Q31)

Impressed with the fact that mot used data from the table and made plausible reasons WHY the TDS etc increased on Tue and bacteria on Thu (one possibility is high rainfall = erosion on Tue and an consequent sewage overflow on Thu).